top of page
  • Simon Cox

Nibbler

Online testing tool that checks out how your website measures up

I have been evan­ge­lis­ing web stan­dards for quite a few years now and tools that help you test your work are very appre­ci­at­ed and make the tasks a lot eas­i­er. For pure code there is the W3C test­ing suite that tells you where your code is invalid and gives good hints on what to change — though I can imag­ine it could be frus­trat­ing for peo­ple rel­a­tive­ly new to html. W3C also do CSS and feed val­ida­tors. How­ev­er by far my favourite test­ing tool is cur­rent­ly Nib­bler from Silk­tide. Sev­er­al years ago Silk­tide released a cut down on-line ver­sion of its com­mer­cial ser­vice called Sitescore but they were very quick­ly over­whelmed with peo­ple test­ing out sites and there real empha­sis had to go back to the com­mer­cial tool and the free ser­vice was demised. Sitescore has now mor­phed into Sit­eR­ay and ver­sion 4 is on the way. Some­how they have man­aged to do a small side project of anoth­er cut down ver­sion of their test­ing suite — this time they have named it Nibbler.


Nib­bler tests a web­site across a large range of auto­mat­ed tests. Auto­mat­ed means that they are not per­fect but will take you most of the way there which is a very good start and more than most even think about.


You just put the URL into the test field and press the test but­ton and a minute or two lat­er you have the score.


As of the 9th of Feb­ru­ary 2010 this site, simon​cox​.com, is scor­ing 7.9 out of 10 — and that’s pret­ty good — veer​le​.duoh​.com, alistapart​.com and www​.w3​.org all have the same score so I am in good com­pa­ny. www​.silk​tide​.com is only 0.1 points ahead and they are the experts.


Nib­bler runs the fol­low­ing tests:

  • Trust­wor­thi­ness

  • Social media

  • Pop­u­lar­i­ty

  • Incom­ing links

  • URL for­mat

  • Images

  • Inof­fen­sive con­tent

  • Ana­lyt­ics

  • Alter­na­tive text

  • Titles

  • Head­ings

  • Links

  • Meta tags

  • Print­abil­i­ty

  • Feeds

  • W3C com­pli­ance

and the report will give you some good clues on what’s wrong and how to fix. I will point out that this is cur­rent­ly in alpha but I have raised a cou­ple of issues with them on Get Sat­is­fac­tion and they have respond­ed very quick­ly. For exam­ple yes­ter­day on one site was doing very bad­ly for feeds so I rebuilt the feed and added the meta tags so that it could be found.


The report said that although it had found the feed it had not been updat­ed for over a month — I had 10 new items in the feed for the last 8 days so some­thing was wrong. Andy from Silk­tide spot­ted that I had used the Dublin Core date stamp which was per­fect­ly valid but Nib­bler was not detect­ing it so he fixed it same day — splendid.


I am sure a lot of peo­ple will get frus­trat­ed with the ini­tial scores from Nib­bler but with a bit of patience and under­stand­ing what’s going on you can real­ly improve your web­site. Not every­one will agree with some of the tests Nib­bler uses but if every site was test­ed against this or sim­i­lar tools then the web would be a much bet­ter place.


Nib­bler can be found at https://​nib​bler​.silk​tide​.com


Note: I have no affil­i­a­tion with Silk­tide but in my day job I do use the full blown ver­sion of Sit­eR­ay to test the web­sites I work on. Nib­bler I use for my per­son­al websites.


 

And there is more...

19 August 2010

I have just tidied up some of the html on the site — now ful­ly val­i­dates and the site is get­ting a Nib­bler score of 9.2 — very pleased with that and I find the site at no. 54 on the Top 100 on the Nib­bler top 100 chart — sure it won’t stay there for long but its an achievement!


23 August 2010

I have made a few more minor adjust­ments to the site and its now up to a 9.4 rat­ing putting the site 7th on the Nib­bler top 100 at the moment!


simoncox,com is 7th in the Nibbler top 100
simoncox,com is 7th in the Nibbler top 100


16 views

Related Posts

See All
bottom of page